ADSL and SDSL and Load balancing

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_topic_old
ADSL and SDSL and Load balancing
Avatar
rhuntington
Member
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
March 9, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 16, 2011 - 11:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I'm considering adding an SDSL line to a small office. Currently, our service is an ADSL with POTS. I was wondering if there would be any issues with using an ADSL and SDSL with a load balanced switch. Would the switch try to compensate between the ADSL dnld upld speed (3.0-6.0M, 512K-768K) and the SDSL dnld upld (1.5M)? Is there a particular model that would be better for this type of setup, or would it be better to have two SDSLs with matched speeds?

Avatar
Chad Johnson
Mod
Forum Posts: 867
Member Since:
August 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 16, 2011 - 2:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

wow--a networking question.

So here's the funny thing: I understood the question completely, and all the terminology, but I have no idea what the answer is. I don't deal with complex networking in my day to day (I have a whole team of people for that) and so I have done the following: I asked them.

I'll let you know what I hear back.

--Zig

Avatar
Chad Johnson
Mod
Forum Posts: 867
Member Since:
August 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 16, 2011 - 7:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

So here's what my network guru came back with:

[quote="Ziggie's Network Guru":1cn853ln]
I would need to know lots more about his environment but I doubt he'll have much luck. Generally speaking, one can load balance two circuits to the same provider using a router. (I do per packet load balancing with my two telco T1 lines.) If it is through two providers, one would need something to do per destination load balancing. Otherwise, the source IP address keep changing which hoses up session state and the like. The alternative (but not cheap) is the use BGP to achieve multiple routes. That isn't really a 'load balancing' method though.

Nutshell: What's he trying to accomplish?
[/quote:1cn853ln]

So, does this help? And what's your end goal?

--Zig

Avatar
rhuntington
Member
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
March 9, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 17, 2011 - 4:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Somewhat- ideally, we would be using static IP's from the ISP because we do some HTTPS, SSL and FTP. Basically, I'm trying to create a "poor man's T1". Ideally, I would like to have the load heavy side of the office on the SDSL and the "casual net users" on the ADSL and route the traffic accordingly. Also, it would be the same ISP on both lines (sort of) the static SDSL is a branch company from the main ISP.

Avatar
Chad Johnson
Mod
Forum Posts: 867
Member Since:
August 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 17, 2011 - 10:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

You use the word 'ideally' a lot. I find that amusing because I talk all day every day with both my network guys and my security guys about ideal situations (which we never have).

Anywayz--I've passed this back to my network guru.

--Zig

Avatar
Chad Johnson
Mod
Forum Posts: 867
Member Since:
August 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
March 18, 2011 - 11:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

[quote="rhuntington":2x2vb30t]Somewhat- ideally, we would be using static IP's from the ISP because we do some HTTPS, SSL and FTP. Basically, I'm trying to create a "poor man's T1". Ideally, I would like to have the load heavy side of the office on the SDSL and the "casual net users" on the ADSL and route the traffic accordingly. Also, it would be the same ISP on both lines (sort of) the static SDSL is a branch company from the main ISP.[/quote:2x2vb30t]

OK, essentially, to split traffic it's as simple as setting separate gateways for your users and your machines. Servers use gateway A (SDSL) and users use gateway B (ADSL). Essentially any router will be able to do this for you. Depending on your comfort and expertise my network gurus say Cisco is the industry standard.

--Zig

Avatar
rhuntington
Member
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
March 9, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
March 21, 2011 - 9:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Oh- duh, yeah, I was totally over thinking it. Thanks! now I just need to get boss approval =).

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis

Most Users Ever Online: 2303

Currently Online: DroneApplications
37 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 11

Members: 3143

Moderators: 8

Admins: 4

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 20

Topics: 1933

Posts: 13499

Administrators: Jim Hillier, Richard Pedersen, David Hartsock, Marc Thomas

Moderators: Carol Bratt, dandl, Jason Shuffield, Jim Canfield, Terry Hollett, Stuart Berg, John Durso, Reza Reza

Scroll to Top

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER?

Get great content like this delivered to your inbox!

It's free, convenient, and delivered right to your inbox! We do not spam and we will not share your address. Period!