Intro to point and shoot cameras.

This forum requires Javascript to be enabled for posting content

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
Intro to point and shoot cameras.
Jim Hillier
Admin
Forum Posts: 2596
Member Since:
August 9, 2011
Offline
1
January 18, 2010 - 5:54 am

Hey Ron - Nice article...thanks mate.

One comment. I notice only one of the cameras you highlighted includes an optical viewer...at least that's the way it looks in the images. I recently upgraded from my old Canon (with optical viewer + LCD screen) to a Panasonic Lumix which only has an LCD viewer. Even though the LCD screen is quite a bit larger than that of the Canon I still struggle to see the subject clearly, outside on a bright sunny day it is nigh an impossibility.

I would never again buy a camera which did not include an optical viewer.

Just a thought,
Cheers.....JIM

P.S. I do wear my glasses when using the camera....LOL

OldElmerFudd
Member
Forum Posts: 166
Member Since:
December 7, 2008
Offline
2
January 19, 2010 - 12:22 am

Greetings!

You mentioned your older digital had optical+LCD viewers - that was pretty standard back back when these cameras became more accepted. Users expected a viewfinder and the manufacturers provided them. As the little cameras got smaller, the optical viewfinder simply took up too much room in the case. With the prices dropping at the same time, new users were not put off by having only an LCD to view. Coupled with ever larger LCD's, the cameras were produced without anything to look through!

My first digital was a Nikon 990; about $1000 in 2000-2001, with all of 3.34 megapixel resolution - absolutely top of the line for a prosumer camera. After thirty years of shooting film cameras, one of the absolute necessities was an optical viewfinder for this old photographer. Of course, those early digitals didn't have an LCD viewer, but I would have had the same reaction you did with your Panasonic!

The cameras I used to illustrate the article were chosen for their overall quality/price ratio. I don't use them or need them, but not everyone is used to budgeting for gear the way I do.

Best,
Ron

D3vz
Member
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
March 4, 2018
Offline
3
March 6, 2018 - 10:52 pm

any updates on this thread? Would like to get your suggestions on some good to buy mirrorless cameras

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis

Most Users Ever Online: 2303

Currently Online:
26 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 10

Members: 2577

Moderators: 7

Admins: 4

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 19

Topics: 1834

Posts: 13090

Administrators: Jim Hillier, Richard Pedersen, David Hartsock, Marc Thomas

Moderators: Carol Bratt, dandl, Jason Shuffield, Jim Canfield, Terry Hollett, Dick Evans, Sergey Grankin

Exit mobile version

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER?

Get great content like this delivered to your inbox!

It's free, convenient, and delivered right to your inbox! We do not spam and we will not share your address. Period!