Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_topic_old
Google Chrome 10 -- Even Faster
Avatar
Chad Johnson
Mod
Members
March 11, 2011 - 7:55 am
Member Since: August 11, 2011
Forum Posts: 867
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Google has launched Chrome Version 10 --- with even faster Javascript support.

[url:1jt0rdmm]http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20040627-264.html[/url:1jt0rdmm]

[quote=From the Article]
Chrome 10 comes with the "Crankshaft" version of the V8 browser engine that Google pegs as 66 percent faster than the unnamed version in Chrome 9 as measured with Google's V8 Benchmark suite. That's a major speed boost, but be aware there are many other attributes of browser performance, and one of the biggest--hardware acceleration--will hit prime time with the imminent release of Mozilla's Firefox 4 and Microsoft's IE9.

Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20040 ... z1GIMFcCrb

I switched to using Chrome as my primary browser about 6 months ago -- it loaded faster than Firefox and browsed as well as anything else.

I upgraded to the new version this morning. We'll see if it gets faster.

Avatar
Jim Hillier
Admin
March 11, 2011 - 2:22 pm
Member Since: August 9, 2011
Forum Posts: 2709
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hey Zig - Chrome even faster......wow!!!

This whole browser war thingee is really hotting up. One of the aspects I've been finding very interesting to read about is the hassle over web video standards, I hadn't realised that certain aspects of video encoding were actually patented.

Apparently, Google's new VP8 video technology was designed specifically to overcome patents connected with H264. The company which manages and licenses all these patents is now openly claiming that certain aspects of Google's VP8[i:329edmtp] may[/i:329edmtp] be infringing on existing patents. The company has absolutely no proof of any patent violations but their insinuations are muddying the waters in an area where patents are already an extremely complex affair.

Read the full story [url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20038615-264.html?tag=rb_content;main:329edmtp]HERE[/url:329edmtp].

Cheers.....Jim

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Most Users Ever Online: 2303
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 78
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Chad Johnson: 867
Mindblower: 677
carbonterry2: 356
Flying Dutchman: 278
grr: 211
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 11
Members: 3229
Moderators: 7
Admins: 3
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 20
Topics: 1954
Posts: 13563
Newest Members:
instaproapk, mousetesteronline, keshamatt, Patriciabin, MattOwens
Moderators: Carol Bratt: 67, dandl: 740, Jason Shuffield: 1, Jim Canfield: 8, Terry Hollett: 0, Stuart Berg: 0, John Durso: 0
Administrators: Jim Hillier: 2709, Richard Pedersen: 210, David Hartsock: 1117
Scroll to Top

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER?

Get great content like this delivered to your inbox!

It's free, convenient, and delivered right to your inbox! We do not spam and we will not share your address. Period!