Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_topic_old
Google Chrome 10 -- Even Faster
Avatar
Chad Johnson
Mod
Members
Forum Posts: 867
Member Since:
August 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 11, 2011 - 7:55 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Google has launched Chrome Version 10 --- with even faster Javascript support.

[url:1jt0rdmm]http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20040627-264.html[/url:1jt0rdmm]

[quote=From the Article]
Chrome 10 comes with the "Crankshaft" version of the V8 browser engine that Google pegs as 66 percent faster than the unnamed version in Chrome 9 as measured with Google's V8 Benchmark suite. That's a major speed boost, but be aware there are many other attributes of browser performance, and one of the biggest--hardware acceleration--will hit prime time with the imminent release of Mozilla's Firefox 4 and Microsoft's IE9.

Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20040 ... z1GIMFcCrb

I switched to using Chrome as my primary browser about 6 months ago -- it loaded faster than Firefox and browsed as well as anything else.

I upgraded to the new version this morning. We'll see if it gets faster.

Avatar
Jim Hillier
Admin
Forum Posts: 2726
Member Since:
August 9, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 11, 2011 - 2:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hey Zig - Chrome even faster......wow!!!

This whole browser war thingee is really hotting up. One of the aspects I've been finding very interesting to read about is the hassle over web video standards, I hadn't realised that certain aspects of video encoding were actually patented.

Apparently, Google's new VP8 video technology was designed specifically to overcome patents connected with H264. The company which manages and licenses all these patents is now openly claiming that certain aspects of Google's VP8[i:329edmtp] may[/i:329edmtp] be infringing on existing patents. The company has absolutely no proof of any patent violations but their insinuations are muddying the waters in an area where patents are already an extremely complex affair.

Read the full story [url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20038615-264.html?tag=rb_content;main:329edmtp]HERE[/url:329edmtp].

Cheers.....Jim

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Most Users Ever Online: 2303
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 52
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Chad Johnson: 867
Mindblower: 701
carbonterry2: 356
Flying Dutchman: 278
grr: 211
Newest Members:
sunny01
snave53
daleoS
annaeat
BjourneX
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 20
Topics: 1974
Posts: 13651

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 11
Members: 3256
Moderators: 7
Admins: 3
Administrators: Jim Hillier, Richard Pedersen, David Hartsock
Moderators: Carol Bratt, dandl, Jason Shuffield, Jim Canfield, Terry Hollett, Stuart Berg, John Durso
Scroll to Top